I don’t know how solid this story is, but it sounds too good to be true.

It looks like HBO is developing a series based on the DC Comics Vertigo series Preacher.

Preacher was a 75 issue series written by Garth Ennis with art by Steve Dillon. It told the story of Jesse Custer, a preacher (and not a good one) from a small town in Texas who is possessed and receives a power he calls the “word of God.” If you’re not familiar with the series, just read the Wikipedia entry for a quick rundown. It’s easily one of my all time favorite books and a HBO series would be the perfect way to bring it to cinematic life.

Recently, comic author Mark Millar posted his thoughts about Bryan Singer being announced as the director for the sequel to Superman Returns. They were:

For half the cash, it seems we’re getting twice the excitement and everything that was missing from the first picture. He also says he’s getting all Wrath of Kahn on this one’ which is cool if he means they’re firing the people who did the first flick and bringing in a whole new writer/ director team.

Good news for anyone who’s always wanted a remake of Superman 2, I guess, with Superman’s kid.

Who would Millar rather see attached to the project?

[Brett] Ratner would be better. Seriously. Ditto Michael Bay. Bay can be awful. Truly, truly awful. But when he’s on he’s the best action guy in town. I think he would have raised his game for Supes’ [Ratner’s] Red Dragon is perfect. It’s a really slick movie. And X3 was OK, given what he was working under. Would have loved to have seen him bring back Supes for a new generation (as he planned with a new Krypton, etc, etc) as opposed to the wank-fest for the over 35s Singer did. I want someone to remake Jaws just so Singer knows the agony I’ve gone through since that flick!!!

I have to say I disagree with Millar and here’s why. . .

I loved the Superman movie for what it was. Yes, it was nostalgic for those that grew up watching th original Donner movie, but it also tried to be more than an action movie. The problem with X3 (which I did like quite a bit) was the fact it was too much action and not enough plot/character development. Or, too much plot crammed into too little movie.

Superman Returns took a few simple ideas and developed them. Father/son issues have always been big in Superman, so it’s no surprise to see them in Returns. The idea of Superman being relevant in a post 9/11 society is also quite appealing and timely. While 9/11 didn’t happen in the DC film universe, the idea of violence out of control was shown when Clark watched the news upon returning. Plus, you have to admit Superman stopping the jet from crashing into the ballpark was designed to evoke those emotions.

Yes, I would have liked to have seen a few more action sequences in the film, but not if it meant sacrificing plot. If I have one complaint, it’s that I’m tired of seeing Luthor as the villain.

If anyone questions the success of this movie, then you should watch Carter (our 3-year old son) for a day. At 2 and a half, Superman Returns was the second movie he saw in the theater. Carrying him out of the theater, he had his arms stretched in from of him, imitating Superman flying. Almost a day doesn’t go by without mention of Superman or him recreating the scene from the movie where Superman lifts the Space Shuttle off of the jet plane. He either acts it out with his Superman and Space Shuttle toys or he grabs some large object and lifts it over his head.

While I have no idea what’s going on inside of his head, I can’t help get the feeling that it’s they way I felt when I first saw Star Wars when I was 3 years old or the way I felt when I saw Superman fly for the first time in 1978. To me, as a father, that’s a much better feeling than watching the Superman “action” movie by Michael Bay for 2 hours.